The True Cost of Olympic Glory: An Economic Perspective

The Olympic Games, held every four years, stand as one of the most significant and widely viewed international events. It’s a representation of a global unity, bringing together athletes from around the globe to compete in the spirit of sportsmanship and excellence. Beyond the captivating competitions, the Olympics hold immense economic significance, impacting host cities, national economies and even global market trends.  

Key Points 

• Host cities for the Olympics invest billions in infrastructure, creating jobs and boosting the local economy before the Games. 

• Post-Games, some cities benefit from improved infrastructure and tourism, while others struggle with financial burdens from underutilised facilities. 

• Most Olympic Games experience significant cost overruns, leading to long-term financial impacts, with mixed outcomes for host cities. 

Part 1: Economic Impact of Hosting the Olympics  

Infrastructure Investments 

A hallmark of hosting the Olympics is the extensive infrastructure development undertaken by host cities. These cities invest billions in building and upgrading stadiums, enhancing transportation systems and expanding hospitality facilities. Such investments create a multitude of jobs ranging from construction workers and engineers to architects and designers, providing a significant boost to the local economy in the years leading up to the Games.  

For example, the overall funding package for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games was reported to be £9.298 billion ^[1]. This amount covered costs for the construction of venues, infrastructure and improvements to public transportation and urban development.  

Employment Opportunities 

The influx of investment into infrastructure and event management creates a surge in employment opportunities. Construction workers are needed for stadium and infrastructure projects. Skilled professionals like event managers, security personnel, medical staff and media personnel are hired to ensure the smooth running of the Games.  

Even the tourism and hospitality sectors experience a surge in demand for staff, as hotels, restaurants and transportation services cater to the influx of visitors. This employment boom can significantly reduce local unemployment rates in the lead-up to and during the Games.  

Long-term Benefits vs. Costs 

While the immediate economic boost from hosting the Olympics is evident, the long-term benefits are often debated. Some cities continue to reap the rewards of enhanced infrastructure and increased tourism, while others struggle with the financial burden of underutilised facilities and maintenance costs.  

Here are some potential long-term impacts: 

1. Enhanced Infrastructure: Hosting the Olympics often necessitates the development of new sports venues, transportation systems and housing. These improvements can benefit the city long after the games have ended.  

2. Increased Tourism: The global exposure a city receives from the Olympics can lead to a sustained increase in tourism, boosting local businesses and the service industry.  

3. Urban Regeneration: The Olympics can act as a catalyst for urban renewal, transforming neglected areas into vibrant neighbourhoods.  

Negative Impacts: 

1. Underutilised Facilities: Post-Olympics, many facilities may not find regular use, leading to high maintenance costs without generating significant revenue to cover them.  

2. Financial Burden: The cost of hosting the Olympics can be enormous and if the revenue generated does not offset this, the city may face long-term financial strain.  

3. Displacement: Construction projects for the Olympics can lead to the displacement of residents and businesses, sometimes without adequate compensation or relocation assistance.  

Economic impact studies often show a mixed picture. While there is usually a short-term economic boost due to construction and increased spending during the games, the long-term benefits are harder to quantify. Some cities, like Barcelona and Sydney, have successfully leveraged the Olympics to enhance their global profile and continue to benefit from the investments made.  

Others, like the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi, which had costs amounted to over $50 billion and 2016 Summer Games in Rio de Janeiro, which reported $20 billion, have struggled with the aftermath, facing issues such as abandoned facilities and debt ^[2].  

Historical Impact of Olympic Costs  

Costs overruns have plagued numerous Olympic Games throughout history. The Montreal Olympics in 1976 is often cited as a cautionary tale. The city’s initial budget was vastly exceeded, with final expenses reaching around $6.093 billion, which was 720% over the original budget ^[3]. The city faced a significant financial burden that took over 30 years to repay. The reasons for these overruns included construction delays, labour strikes and changes in design and materials ^[4].  

The Beijing Olympics in 2008 also experienced cost overruns, although they were more controlled compared to Montreal. The Games were successful in terms of organisation and showcasing China’s capabilities. However, they left behind several venues that did not have a clear post-Games use, leading to ongoing maintenance costs without generating significant revenue ^[5]. 

The Paris 2024 Olympics: A Budgetary Exception  

Interestingly, the upcoming 2024 Paris Olympics stand out for their relatively modest budget. Organisers have pledged to deliver a “frugal” game, leveraging existing infrastructure wherever possible. The total budget for Paris 2024 is estimated at €8.9 billion ($9.2 billion), significantly lower than the recent Summer Games ^[6]. This approach aims to mitigate the risk of cost overruns and ensure a more sustainable financial legacy for the host city.  

For context, the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics final budget figures were announced at $13.1 billion USD, which was significantly higher than the original projected expenses which were around $4.6 billion USD according to the Oxford Olympics 2016 Study ^[7]. The 2020 Tokyo Olympics achieved a balanced budget of JPY 640.4 billion ($ 5.8 billion USD).  

However, the total Games expenditures, including those borne by the Government of Japan and the Tokyo Metropolitan Government, were JPY 1,423.8 billion ($13.0 billion USD). This was a significant deviation from the initial budget projections ^[8]. In contrast, the 2024 Paris Olympics is expected to come in at under $10 billion USD – only about 25% over the initial budget ^[9]. 

A significant factor contributing to the lower budget is the strategic decision to utilise around 95% of existing venues ^[10]. Only three new venue constructions were needed: the Olympic Village at $1.6 billion, the Aquatics Centre at $190 million, and a venue for gymnastics and badminton at $150 million ^[11]. By avoiding the need for extensive new infrastructure, Paris is set to potentially host one of the most cost-effective Olympics in modern history.  

Moreover, the Paris Organising Committee has reported a balanced budget with a contingency reserve maintained at a protective level of €200 million ^[12]. This reserve is intended to cover any unforeseen costs, thereby further safeguarding against potential financial overruns.  

The “frugal” approach of the Paris 2024 Olympics aims not only to prevent cost overruns but also to leave a sustainable financial legacy for the host city.  

The general trend? Cost overruns have been a common trend in the history of the Olympic Games. A study by the University of Oxford found that every Olympic Games from 1960 to 2016 experienced cost overruns, with the average being 172% ^[13]. These overruns can be attributed to various factors, including underestimating the complexity of the projects, political pressures and the desire to use the Games as a platform for urban development and global exposure.  

The financial impact of these overruns can be long-lasting and complex. While some cities have managed to leverage the infrastructure and global attention to their advantage, others have struggled with debts and the challenge of maintaining underutilised facilities. The legacy of the Olympics is thus a mixed one, with both successes and cautionary examples of financial management in hosting such large-scale international events.  

Economic Assessments Post-Games  

Studies on the long-term economic impact of the Olympics paint a complex picture. While some cities, like Los Angeles in 1984, benefitted from existing infrastructure and capitalised on the Games to revitalise specific areas, others haven’t been as fortunate. Athens, which hosted the Games in 2004, saw a pre-Olympic economic boom but faced significant debt and underutilised facilities in the aftermath. The 2016 Rio Olympics similarly left a legacy of abandoned venues and financial strain.  

Case Studies: Athens 2004 and Rio 2016 

Athens 2004 ^[14]: The Athens Olympics costs nearly $11 billion, at least double what the Greek government had initially budgeted. The Greek government hoped that the Games would stimulate economic growth and tourism. However, the country faced a severe economic crisis a few years later, and the Olympics were partly blamed for the massive debt incurred. Many of the facilities built for the Games have since been abandoned or are rarely used, contributing to ongoing maintenance costs without generating revenue.  

Rio 2016: The Rio Olympics  had an initial operational budget of $2.7 billion but ended up with a total expenditure of around $13.2 billion ^[15]. The city made significant infrastructure improvements, including the development of a new subway line and revitalisation of the port area. However, the economic benefits were overshadowed by the country’s worst recession in decades, political scandals and social unrest. Post-Games, many of the Olympic venues have struggled to find a sustainable legacy, with some falling into despair.  

Part 2: Broader Economic Indicators 

Tourism and GDP 

The influx of tourists during the Olympics is a significant economic driver. Increased tourism expenditure on accommodation, transportation, food and souvenirs leads to a boost in the host country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).  

This surge in economic activity can also benefit international trade balances as foreign currency inflows rise. A stronger currency on the forex market can benefit export-oriented businesses by making their products more competitive globally.  

For instance, the Tokyo 2020 Olympics were anticipated to have a significant economic impact on Japan, with expectations of increased tourist spending and potential benefits to the Forex markets and stock prices in tourism-related sectors. Japan had set a target to attract 20 million foreign visitors by 2020 and the Olympics were expected to be a major draw.  

The Bank of Japan highlighted that the increase in foreign tourism was one of the two main channels through which the Tokyo Olympics could positively affect the Japanese economy ^[16]. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the actual number of tourists and the associated spending were impacted.  

The Tokyo Olympics were held without foreign tourists or even domestic fans amid a state of emergency, which led to a decrease in the usual economic benefits associated with hosting the Games. Takahide Kiuchi, an executive economist at Nomura Research Institute, projected that the short-term economic benefits of the Games would be $16.4 billion in June, but he later lowered that to $15.2 billion due to restrictions on spectators ^[17].  

Consumer Spending 

During the Olympics, the host city often experiences a surge in consumer spending as visitors and locals spend more on entertainment, dining and shopping. This increased spending can provide a significant boost to local businesses, particularly in the retail, hospitality and transportation sectors.   

The international viewership of the Olympics can also influence consumer spending patterns worldwide. Products associated with the host country or popular athletes may see an increased demand. For example, after the London 2012 Olympics, there was a notable rise in the sales of sportswear and sports equipment, as viewers were inspired by the athletes’ performances ^[18]. 

The anticipation and occurrence of the Olympics can drive up stock prices in sectors related to consumer spending. Companies in retail, services and hospitality may see their stock values increase due to the expected surge in business during the Games. 

 Additionally, the increased visibility of the host country can attract foreign investment, potentially strengthening the local currency. The London 2012 Olympics, for example, contributed to a stronger British pound in forex markets due to the influx of tourists and the global attention in the UK ^[19]. 

Global Economic Sentiment 

The Olympics possess the unique ability to uplift global economic sentiment. The spirit of competition, camaraderie and athletic excellence can inspire a sense of optimism and confidence, which can positively influence global markets. When investors perceive a more stable and optimistic economic environment, they are more likely to invest in stocks and other assets, leading to a potential rise in stock prices and increased market activity.  

The Tokyo Stock Exchange, for instance, saw a surge during the 2020 Summer Olympics (held in 2021 due to the Covid-19 pandemic).  

This positive sentiment can extend beyond the host country, with investors seeking opportunities in other emerging markets that exhibit similar levels of economic confidence. The perception of global unity and cooperation during the Olympics further boosts confidence in the economy, driving increased investment and market activity.  

The Games provide a platform for showcasing culture, technology and business capabilities, leading to enhanced brand exposure and trade opportunities for companies from the host country, such as Toyota and Panasonic during the Tokyo Olympics. Take a look at Toyota, as one of the Worldwide Olympic Partners, had the chance to display its commitment to sustainable mobility and innovation. The company provided a fleet of electric vehicles, including the Mirai, powered by hydrogen fuel cells to support the transportation needs of the Games ^[20]. 

The influx of spectators and media personnel stimulates local economies through increased consumer spending on accommodation, dining, transportation and merchandise, contributing to economic growth.  

While the positive impact is evident, there are challenges. Overspending on infrastructure can lead to debt, as seen in the case 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics in Russia. The pandemic also disrupted the 2020 Olympics, affecting revenue from ticket sales, tourism and sponsorships.  

Market Liquidity and Volatility 

The hosting of a significant international event such as the Olympics often brings a surge in economic activity. This is partly due to the increased number of tourists, which can lead to a substantial influx of foreign capital. For instance, during the 2012 London Olympics, the UK experienced a rise in visitors, with 590,000 people attending the games, and these visitors spent an average of £1,290 during their visit ^[21]. 

This influx typically results in heightened market liquidity, especially in the host country’s forex and stock markets. Market liquidity refers to the extent to which a market allows assets to be bought and sold at stable prices. It’s quantifiable by the bid-ask spread, trading volume and the market depth.  

However, this increased liquidity can be a double-edged sword, as it may also amplify market volatility. Volatility measures the frequency and magnitude of price movements, both up and down, in a market. It’s often gauged by the standard deviation of returns or the volatility index (VIX).  

Conclusion  

The economic impact of the Olympics is multifaceted. Hosting the Games undeniably stimulates local economies through infrastructure investments, job creation and increased tourism spending.  

Yet, the long-term benefits hinge on careful planning and realistic budgeting to avoid potential debt burdens and underutilised facilities. For the global economy, the Olympics can foster a sense of optimism and confidence, leading to increased foreign investment and higher stock prices. However, the influx of tourists and global attention also contribute to higher market volatility, demanding caution from investors.  

The Olympics hold a unique position in the global economic landscape. Understanding the potential economic and market implications of this mega-event allows individuals and businesses to make informed decisions.  

For investors, recognising the interplay between Olympic events, market sentiment and currency fluctuations can be valuable when formulating investment strategies. Ultimately, the Olympics serve as a microcosm of major economic trends, offering valuable insights into the complex relationship between international events and global markets.  

The Trading Championship 2024 is your chance to showcase your skills and compete in the spirit of the Olympics! Are you up for the challenge? Learn more here.  

Disclaimer: 

Trading CFDs carries significant risks. It is not suitable for all investors and if you are a professional client, you could lose substantially more than your initial investment. When acquiring our CFD products, you have no entitlement, right or obligation to the underlying financial assets. Past performance is no indication of future performance and tax laws are subject to change.  

The information is provided for educational purposes only and doesn’t take into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances, or needs. It does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to seek independent advice if necessary. The information has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained within. This material may contain historical or past performance figures and should not be relied on. Furthermore estimates, forward-looking statements, and forecasts cannot be guaranteed. The information on this site and the products and services offered are not intended for distribution to any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. 

Reference: